Nice minimalistic puzzle. Pretty easy, so I'm still undecided on my rating, but it still made me think.
A nice level, with no tricks or exploits involved and everything in the open. It might not garner any favor from those who feel such novice-hostile methods are obligatory for a good rating, but I liked it very much.
Thanks, guys! Has anyone caught onto the fact that it takes 3 squared (9) steps to solve? Three Squared was my original intention for the name but i guess i had a brain fart when it came time for that.
A mistake that many players do is to compare levels.(This also explains why small levels are usually rated four stars). If we compare levels "sneak in V" and "Cut in half" by Richard fu,the first level is obviously better. But we must always consider the factor "size" and the compactness of the level. This level was really compact and that's why I give you five stars(but I was undecided because I don't really like incomplete rails).
Nice puzzle. It was easy but I'm pretty sure if you had wanted to make it more difficult you could have done it, and this is a great little level as it is.
@chemi What a nice surprise! I made this level more for my own curiosity than as a contender for the FB page.
